MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.6 27B
API pricing, context window and capabilities for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.6 27B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest serving route per 1M tokens, verified against LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersMiniMax M2.7 wins on intelligence and on context window. Qwen3.6 27B wins on price and on coding.
Price
Qwen3.6 27B
Coding
Qwen3.6 27B
Intelligence
MiniMax M2.7
Context window
MiniMax M2.7
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersMiniMax M2.7 wins
- Larger context window (1M vs 262K)
- Higher max output (1M vs 262K)
- More serving providers (2 vs 1)
- Has reasoning mode
Qwen3.6 27B wins
- Cheaper input ($0.26 vs $0.15 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($0.55 vs $0.50 /1M)
- Supports vision
Cheaper overall
Qwen3.6 27B
$0.15 + $0.50 /1M
Larger context
MiniMax M2.7
1M
More providers
MiniMax M2.7
2 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest serving route · per 1M tokens| MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $0.26 | $0.15 best |
| Output $/1M | $0.55 | $0.50 best |
| Context window | 1M best | 262K |
| Max output | 1M best | 262K |
| Serving providers | 2 best | 1 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-04-24 |
Benchmarks
Artificial Analysis indices, side by side| MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 38.1 best | 37.0 |
| Coding | 52.6 | 53.7 best |
| GPQA Diamond | 87% best | 84% |
| Output speed | 59 t/s best | 57 t/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 5.53s best | 33.07s |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
MiniMax M2.7
via Pinstripes
$1.82
Qwen3.6 27B
via Libertai
$1.25
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | — | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | ✓ | — |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | — | — |
| Structured output | — | — |
| Web search | — | — |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for input ($0.26 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens). Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for output ($0.55 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens).
What is the context window difference between MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.6 27B?
MiniMax M2.7 has a 1M-token context window and Qwen3.6 27B has 262K tokens, so MiniMax M2.7 can take a larger prompt.
How do MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.6 27B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked Artificial Analysis indices, Qwen3.6 27B leads on coding, and MiniMax M2.7 leads on intelligence.
Pricing verified against LiteLLM + OpenRouter + provider pages · refreshed daily
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI