Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.6 27B
API pricing, context window and capabilities for Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.6 27B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest serving route per 1M tokens, verified against LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersClaude Fable 5 wins on coding, on intelligence and on context window. Qwen3.6 27B wins on price.
Price
Qwen3.6 27B
Coding
Claude Fable 5
Intelligence
Claude Fable 5
Context window
Claude Fable 5
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersClaude Fable 5 wins
- Larger context window (1M vs 262K)
- More serving providers (4 vs 1)
- Has reasoning mode
- Supports prompt caching
- Supports structured output
Qwen3.6 27B wins
- Cheaper input ($10.00 vs $0.15 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($50.00 vs $0.50 /1M)
- Higher max output (128K vs 262K)
Cheaper overall
Qwen3.6 27B
$0.15 + $0.50 /1M
Larger context
Claude Fable 5
1M
More providers
Claude Fable 5
4 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest serving route · per 1M tokens| Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $10.00 | $0.15 best |
| Output $/1M | $50.00 | $0.50 best |
| Context window | 1M best | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 262K best |
| Serving providers | 4 best | 1 |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-04-24 |
Benchmarks
Artificial Analysis indices, side by side| Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 59.9 best | 37.0 |
| Coding | 76.5 best | 53.7 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93% best | 84% |
| Output speed | 46 t/s | 57 t/s best |
| Latency (TTFT) | 29.29s best | 33.07s |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
Claude Fable 5
via Amazon Bedrock
$100
Qwen3.6 27B
via Libertai
$1.25
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | ✓ | — |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | — |
| Structured output | ✓ | — |
| Web search | — | — |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for input ($10.00 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens). Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for output ($50.00 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens).
What is the context window difference between Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.6 27B?
Claude Fable 5 has a 1M-token context window and Qwen3.6 27B has 262K tokens, so Claude Fable 5 can take a larger prompt.
How do Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.6 27B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked Artificial Analysis indices, Claude Fable 5 leads on coding, and Claude Fable 5 leads on intelligence.
Pricing verified against LiteLLM + OpenRouter + provider pages · refreshed daily
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI