Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 27B
API pricing, context window and capabilities for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest listed serving route per 1M tokens, from LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersQwen3.6 27B wins on price, on Terminal-Bench, on intelligence and on context window.
Price
Qwen3.6 27B
Terminal-Bench
Qwen3.6 27B
Intelligence
Qwen3.6 27B
Context window
Qwen3.6 27B
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersMercury 2 wins
No clear edge on the tracked metrics.
Qwen3.6 27B wins
- Cheaper input ($0.25 vs $0.15 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($0.75 vs $0.50 /1M)
- Larger context window (128K vs 262K)
- Higher max output (50K vs 262K)
- More serving providers (3 vs 8)
- Supports vision
- Has reasoning mode
- Has web search
Cheaper overall
Qwen3.6 27B
$0.15 + $0.50 /1M
Larger context
Qwen3.6 27B
262K
More providers
Qwen3.6 27B
8 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest listed route · per 1M tokensOn-demand listed rates, OpenRouter routed quotes and Vercel reseller quotes. Enterprise commitments can be materially lower.
| Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $0.25via Inception | $0.15via Libertai best |
| Output $/1M | $0.75via Inception | $0.50via Libertai best |
| Context window | 128K | 262K best |
| Max output | 50K | 262K best |
| Serving providers | 3 | 8 best |
| Date | Released Feb 24, 2026 | Released Apr 24, 2026 |
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores, side by side| Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 13.8 | 21.4 best |
| Terminal-Bench | 27% | 61% best |
| GPQA Diamond | 77% | 84% best |
| Output speed | 554 t/s best | 58 t/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 6.83s | 3.62s best |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
Mercury 2
via Inception
$2.00
Qwen3.6 27B
via Libertai
$1.25
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | — | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | — | ✓ |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web search | — | ✓ |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for input ($0.25 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens) from Libertai. Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for output ($0.75 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens) from Libertai.
What is the context window difference between Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B?
Mercury 2 has a 128K-token context window and Qwen3.6 27B has 262K tokens, so Qwen3.6 27B can take a larger prompt.
How do Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B leads on Terminal-Bench, and Qwen3.6 27B leads on intelligence.
Listed prices from LiteLLM, OpenRouter and Vercel · last checked Oct 14, 2026
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI