Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 27B
API pricing, context window and capabilities for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest serving route per 1M tokens, verified against LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersQwen3.6 27B wins on price, on coding, on intelligence and on context window.
Price
Qwen3.6 27B
Coding
Qwen3.6 27B
Intelligence
Qwen3.6 27B
Context window
Qwen3.6 27B
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersMercury 2 wins
No clear edge on the tracked metrics.
Qwen3.6 27B wins
- Cheaper input ($0.25 vs $0.15 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($0.75 vs $0.50 /1M)
- Larger context window (128K vs 262K)
- Higher max output (50K vs 262K)
- More serving providers (2 vs 6)
- Supports vision
- Has reasoning mode
Cheaper overall
Qwen3.6 27B
$0.15 + $0.50 /1M
Larger context
Qwen3.6 27B
262K
More providers
Qwen3.6 27B
6 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest serving route · per 1M tokens| Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $0.25 | $0.15 best |
| Output $/1M | $0.75 | $0.50 best |
| Context window | 128K | 262K best |
| Max output | 50K | 262K best |
| Serving providers | 2 | 6 best |
| Released | 2026-02-24 | 2026-04-24 |
Benchmarks
Artificial Analysis indices, side by side| Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 21.9 | 37.7 best |
| Coding | 31.1 | 53.7 best |
| GPQA Diamond | 77% | 84% best |
| Output speed | 939 t/s best | 50 t/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 3.44s best | 3.75s |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
Mercury 2
via Inception
$2.00
Qwen3.6 27B
via Libertai
$1.25
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | — | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | — | ✓ |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web search | — | — |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for input ($0.25 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens). Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper for output ($0.75 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens).
What is the context window difference between Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B?
Mercury 2 has a 128K-token context window and Qwen3.6 27B has 262K tokens, so Qwen3.6 27B can take a larger prompt.
How do Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 27B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked Artificial Analysis indices, Qwen3.6 27B leads on coding, and Qwen3.6 27B leads on intelligence.
Pricing verified against LiteLLM + OpenRouter + provider pages · refreshed daily
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI