Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

API pricing, context window and capabilities for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest listed serving route per 1M tokens, from LiteLLM and OpenRouter.

Verdict

computed from the published numbers

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins on Terminal-Bench, on intelligence and on context window.

Price
Tied
Terminal-Bench
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Intelligence
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Key takeaways

who wins on what, from the published numbers

Mercury 2 wins

  • Cheaper output ($0.75 vs $0.986 /1M)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins

  • Cheaper input ($0.25 vs $0.164 /1M)
  • Larger context window (128K vs 262K)
  • Higher max output (50K vs 262K)
  • More serving providers (3 vs 7)
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Has web search
Cheaper overall
Mercury 2
$0.25 + $0.75 /1M
Larger context
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
262K
More providers
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
7 providers

Pricing & specs

cheapest listed route · per 1M tokens
On-demand listed rates, OpenRouter routed quotes and Vercel reseller quotes. Enterprise commitments can be materially lower.
Mercury 2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input $/1M$0.25via Inception $0.164via Aihubmix best
Output $/1M$0.75via Inception best$0.986via Aihubmix
Context window128K 262K best
Max output50K 262K best
Serving providers3 7 best
DateReleased Feb 24, 2026 Released Feb 16, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores, side by side
Mercury 2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Intelligence13.8 18.4 best
Terminal-Bench27% 51% best
GPQA Diamond77% 89% best
Output speed554 t/s best56 t/s
Latency (TTFT)6.83s 2.44s best

Cost calculator

choose a serving route for each side
Input tokens / month
Output tokens / month
Mercury 2
via Inception
$2.00
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
via Aihubmix
$1.81

Capabilities

feature support, side by side
FeatureMercury 2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision—✓
Tool use✓✓
Reasoning—✓
Audio——
Prompt caching✓✓
Structured output✓✓
Web search—✓

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper for input ($0.25 vs $0.164 per 1M tokens) from Aihubmix. Mercury 2 is cheaper for output ($0.75 vs $0.986 per 1M tokens) from Inception.
What is the context window difference between Mercury 2 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Mercury 2 has a 128K-token context window and Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 262K tokens, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B can take a larger prompt.
How do Mercury 2 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads on Terminal-Bench, and Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads on intelligence.
Listed prices from LiteLLM, OpenRouter and Vercel · last checked Oct 14, 2026

Every weekday

AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.

News, analysis, tools, and more.

For people who build with AI