MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
API pricing, context window and capabilities for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B, side by side. Prices are the cheapest serving route per 1M tokens, verified against LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersMiniMax M2.7 wins on price, on coding, on intelligence and on context window.
Price
MiniMax M2.7
Coding
MiniMax M2.7
Intelligence
MiniMax M2.7
Context window
MiniMax M2.7
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersMiniMax M2.7 wins
- Cheaper input ($0.26 vs $0.60 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($0.55 vs $3.60 /1M)
- Larger context window (1M vs 262K)
- Higher max output (1M vs 66K)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins
- More serving providers (2 vs 3)
- Supports vision
- Supports structured output
Cheaper overall
MiniMax M2.7
$0.26 + $0.55 /1M
Larger context
MiniMax M2.7
1M
More providers
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
3 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest serving route · per 1M tokens| MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $0.26 best | $0.60 |
| Output $/1M | $0.55 best | $3.60 |
| Context window | 1M best | 262K |
| Max output | 1M best | 66K |
| Serving providers | 2 | 3 best |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-02-16 |
Benchmarks
Artificial Analysis indices, side by side| MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 38.1 best | 33.7 |
| Coding | 52.6 best | 48.2 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87% | 89% best |
| Output speed | 59 t/s | 61 t/s best |
| Latency (TTFT) | 5.53s best | 9.37s |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
MiniMax M2.7
via Pinstripes
$1.82
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
via OpenRouter
$6.60
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | — | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | — | — |
| Structured output | — | ✓ |
| Web search | — | — |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper for input ($0.26 vs $0.60 per 1M tokens). MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper for output ($0.55 vs $3.60 per 1M tokens).
What is the context window difference between MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
MiniMax M2.7 has a 1M-token context window and Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 262K tokens, so MiniMax M2.7 can take a larger prompt.
How do MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked Artificial Analysis indices, MiniMax M2.7 leads on coding, and MiniMax M2.7 leads on intelligence.
Pricing verified against LiteLLM + OpenRouter + provider pages · refreshed daily
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI