GLM 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
API pricing, context window and capabilities for GLM 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code, side by side. Prices are the cheapest listed serving route per 1M tokens, from LiteLLM and OpenRouter.
Verdict
computed from the published numbersGLM 5.1 wins on intelligence. Kimi K2.7 Code wins on price, on Terminal-Bench and on context window.
Price
Kimi K2.7 Code
Terminal-Bench
Kimi K2.7 Code
Intelligence
GLM 5.1
Context window
Kimi K2.7 Code
Key takeaways
who wins on what, from the published numbersGLM 5.1 wins
No clear edge on the tracked metrics.
Kimi K2.7 Code wins
- Cheaper input ($1.05 vs $0.671 /1M)
- Cheaper output ($3.50 vs $3.35 /1M)
- Larger context window (205K vs 262K)
- Higher max output (203K vs 262K)
- More serving providers (12 vs 16)
- Supports vision
Cheaper overall
Kimi K2.7 Code
$0.671 + $3.35 /1M
Larger context
Kimi K2.7 Code
262K
More providers
Kimi K2.7 Code
16 providers
Pricing & specs
cheapest listed route · per 1M tokensOn-demand listed rates, OpenRouter routed quotes and Vercel reseller quotes. Enterprise commitments can be materially lower. An OpenRouter routed quote is the price of whichever upstream provider OpenRouter prefers today, so it moves day to day.
| GLM 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M | $1.05via DeepInfra | $0.671OpenRouter routed quote best |
| Output $/1M | $3.50via DeepInfra | $3.35OpenRouter routed quote best |
| Context window | 205K | 262K best |
| Max output | 203K | 262K best |
| Serving providers | 12 | 16 best |
| Date | Released Apr 7, 2026 | Released Jun 13, 2026 |
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores, side by side| GLM 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 26.1 best | 25.8 |
| Terminal-Bench | 62% | 67% best |
| GPQA Diamond | 87% | 90% best |
| Output speed | 66 t/s best | 64 t/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.71s best | 2.75s |
Cost calculator
choose a serving route for each sideInput tokens / month
Output tokens / month
GLM 5.1
via DeepInfra
$8.75
Kimi K2.7 Code
via OpenRouter
$6.71
Capabilities
feature support, side by side| Feature | GLM 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | — | ✓ |
| Tool use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | — | — |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web search | — | — |
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.1 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper for input ($1.05 vs $0.671 per 1M tokens) as an OpenRouter routed quote, while Moonshot lists it at $0.95 per 1M input. Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper for output ($3.50 vs $3.35 per 1M tokens) as an OpenRouter routed quote, while Moonshot lists it at $4.00 per 1M output.
What is the context window difference between GLM 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code?
GLM 5.1 has a 205K-token context window and Kimi K2.7 Code has 262K tokens, so Kimi K2.7 Code can take a larger prompt.
How do GLM 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code compare on benchmarks?
On the tracked benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code leads on Terminal-Bench, and GLM 5.1 leads on intelligence.
Listed prices from LiteLLM, OpenRouter and Vercel · last checked Oct 14, 2026
Every weekday
AI moves fast. Here's your debrief.
News, analysis, tools, and more.
For people who build with AI